NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: MH v R [2022] NSWCCA 287 Hearing dates: 17 June 2022 Date of orders: 15 December 2022 Decision date: 15 December 2022 Before: Ward P at [1] Mitchelmore JA at [2] Lonergan J at [3] Decision: (1) To the extent necessary, extend time within which to file a notice of appeal until 13 October 2021. (2) Grant leave to appeal. (3) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – extension of time in which to appeal – sentenced and notice of intention filed in 2018 – appeal filed in 2021 – extension granted CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – multiple offences – where background of very substantial disadvantage taken into account – whether error in application of Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 principles – whether error in not reducing offender's moral culpability – no error shown CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – assistance to authorities – provision of phone number resulting in sentencing of another offender for drug and other offences – whether 5% discount manifestly inadequate – no misapplication of principle or error shown CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – multiple offences – custodial conditions significantly worse than contemplated – whether evidence "new" or "fresh" – whether evidence should be admitted – not "exceptional" – evidence not admitted – ground dismissed CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – parity – specially aggravated kidnapping – whether sentencing judge failed adequately to consider each offender's level of criminality and subjective cases – no justifiable sense of grievance Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 86(3), 154C(2), 350 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 23 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 25(1) Cases Cited: Brierley v The Queen [2022] NSWCCA 26 Bugmy v the Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Fordham v R (1997) A Crim R 359 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Judge v R [2018] NSWCCA 203 Nasrallah v R (2021) 105 NSWLR 451; [2021] NSWCCA 207 Perkins v R [2018] NSWCCA 62 R v Chaaban [2006] NSWCCA 107 R v Dungay [2020] NSWCCA 209 R v Munday [1981] 2 NSWLR 177 R v Vachalec (1981) 1 NSWLR 351; [1981] NSWCCA 26 WM v R [2020] NSWCCA 96 Wright v R [2016] NSWCCA 122 Category: Principal judgment Parties: MH (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Woods / K Lloyd (Applicant) A Morris (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate