NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Dibb v Transport for NSW [2022] NSWCATAD 398 Hearing dates: 28 March 2022 Date of orders: 15 December 2022 Decision date: 15 December 2022 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: C Mulvey, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW – government information – access application – unreasonable and substantial diversion of agency's resources – refuse to deal – ss57, 58 and 60 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 Cases Cited: Cianfrano v Director General, Premier's Department [2006] NSWADT 137 Commission of Police v Danis [2017] NSWCATAP 7 Department of Education and Communities (NSW) (No 2) [2013] NSWADT 130 Dibb v Transport for NSW [2021] NSWCATAD 340 Dibb v Transport for NSW (No 2) [2022] NSWCATAP 89 Feeney v Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice [2020] NSWCATAD 269 Hickey v Secretary, Department of Education [2021] SWADTAP 306 Ruyters v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 223 WL v Randwick City Council [2007] NSWADTAP 58 Texts Cited: None cited. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Raymond Dibb (Applicant) Transport for NSW (Respondent) Also heard: Information Commissioner (see s 104(1), Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009) Representation: Applicant (Self Represented) R Jeyasingam (Authorised Officer) (Respondent) Information Commissioner File Number(s): 2021/00334247 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate