NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AS v R [2022] NSWCCA 291 Hearing dates: 30 September 2022 Decision date: 21 December 2022 Before: Adamson J at [1]; Hamill J at [145]; Cavanagh J at [194] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME — Appeals — Appeal against conviction — Unreasonable verdict — where discrepancies in evidence about timing — whether discrepancies could be explained by complainant's age — appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 61M, 61O, 66A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6 Cases Cited: BCM v The Queen [2013] HCA 48; (2013) 303 ALR 387 Coughlan v The Queen (2020) 267 CLR 654; [2020] HCA 15 Crickitt v R [2018] NSWCCA 240 Dansie v The Queen [2022] HCA 25; (2022) 403 ALR 21 GS v R [2022] NSWCCA 225 JN v R [2019] NSWCCA 287 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606; [2002] HCA 53 Morris v The Queen (1987) 163 CLR 454; [1987] HCA 50 Pell v The Queen (2020) 268 CLR 123; [2020] HCA 12 R v Johnston (1998) 45 NSWLR 362 Reed v R [2006] NSWCCA 314 SKA v The Queen (2011) 243 CLR 400; [2011] HCA 13 The Queen v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 TK v R (2009) 74 NSWLR 299; [2009] NSWCCA 151 Z (a pseudonym) v R [2022] NSWCCA 8 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AS (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Moutasallem (Applicant) A Bonnor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate