NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Taleb (Final) [2022] NSWSC 1748 Hearing dates: 12 December 2022 Date of orders: 16 December 2022 Decision date: 16 December 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Yehia J Decision: (1) An order pursuant to ss 20, 25(1)(a), 26(6) and 39(1)(a) of the Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 (NSW) that the defendant be subject to an Extended Supervision Order for a period of two years from today, 16 December 2022. (2) An order pursuant to s 29 (1) of the Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 (NSW) directing the defendant to comply with the conditions set out in Schedule A to the Amended Summons, filed on 8 December 2022, as further amended by these reasons for the period of the Extended Supervision Order. Catchwords: CIVIL LAW — high risk offender — terrorism — violent extremism — whether offender should be subject to further extended supervision order (final) — whether unacceptable risk offender will commit serious terrorism offence — appropriate conditions Legislation Cited: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), ss 4, 11.4, 80.2C, 100.1 and 119 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), s 10(1) Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 (NSW), ss 20, 25, 26, 29, 34, 39, 40, 41, 42, 50, 69 Cases Cited: Cheema v State of New South Wales [2020] NSWCA 190 Hardy v State of New South Wales [2021] NSWCA 338 Lodhi v R (2006) 199 FLR 303 Lynn v State of New South Wales(2016) 91 NSWLR 636 New South Wales v Elomar (Final) [2021] NSWSC 411 State of New South Wales v Baker (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 483 State of New South Wales v Bugmy [2017] NSWSC 855 State of New South Wales v Davis (Final) [2021] NSWSC 837 State of New South Wales v Donovan [2015] NSWSC 280 State of New South Wales v Green (Final) [2013] NSWSC 1003 State of New South Wales v Ley Thomas Baker (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 483 State of New South Wales v Tillman [2008] NSWSC 1293 State of NSW v Ibrahim [2021] NSWSC State of NSW v Naaman (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 328 State of NSW v Wilkinson (Preliminary) [2020] NSWSC 1813 Thomas v Mowbray (2007) 233 CLR 307; [2007] HCA 33 Wilde v State of New South Wales [2015] NSWCA 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Moudasser Taleb (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P McDonald SC with R McEwen and S Hoare (Plaintiff) D Bhutani (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate