NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Corry v NHB Enterprises Pty Limited [2022] NSWCA 280 Hearing dates: 5 October 2022 Date of orders: 19 December 2022 Decision date: 19 December 2022 Before: Simpson AJA Decision: (1) Amended Notice of Motion filed on 12 September 2022 dismissed; (2) The applicant (Alexander Stephen Corry) pay the respondents costs of the Amended Notice of Motion. Catchwords: APPEALS — Procedural fairness — Hearing rule — where applicant alleged failure to disclose evidence which was central to findings of contempt — whether legitimate forensic purpose could be demonstrated in seeking leave to issue a subpoena Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Hamzy v Commissioner of Corrective Services (No 1) [2017] NSWSC 183 NHB Enterprises Pty Ltd v Corry (No 7) [2021] NSWSC 741 NHB Enterprises Pty Ltd v Corry (No 8) [2022] NSWSC 97 NHB Enterprises Pty Ltd v Corry (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 272 Samootin v Shea [2002] NSWCA 115; Secretary of the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment v Blacktown City Council [2021] NSWCA 145 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Alexander Corry (1st Applicant) Boriana Corry (2nd Applicant) NHB Enterprises Pty Limited (1st Respondent) Finn Pharmaceuticals Trust Pty Ltd (2nd Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant self represented T Senior (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate