NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Clough v Breen & Anor (No. 2) [2022] NSWSC 1759 Hearing dates: 1 August and 20 September 2022 Date of orders: 19 December 2022 Decision date: 19 December 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: A declaration made that Easement I does not permit the defendants to place a CCTV camera on the area of the plaintiff's land burdened by the easement. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY – EASEMENTS – dispute in relation to the use of various easements for the use of an inclinator, the supply of services, giving rights-of-way, and other related easements – between the plaintiff and the defendants who are neighbours – interlocutory orders made in August 2022 pending determination of final issues – the early determination of some issues to reduce the number of disputes between the parties considered – whether early determination of some of the issues is possible – of the issues isolated one is identified as capable of early determination, as to whether a CCTV camera is authorised by Easement I to be positioned on the plaintiff's land. Cases Cited: Breen v Clough [2017] NSWSC 1681 Breen v Clough [2018] NSWCA 172 Clough v Breen [2020] NSWSC 653 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant: Christine May Clough First Defendant/Cross-Claimant: Douglas Martin Breen Second Defendant/Cross-Claimant: Tracey Jane Dillon Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant: Mr D.O'Connor; Ms C. Langford Defendant/Cross Claimants: Mr F. Maghami; Mr M. McGirr
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate