NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Australia v Pender (Final) [2022] NSWSC 1773 Hearing dates: 5 December 2022 Date of orders: 21 December 2022 Decision date: 21 December 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: See [210] Catchwords: CRIMINAL CODE – terrorism high risk offender – post-sentence order – extended supervision order – community protection – Division 105A – comparable State legislation – unacceptable risk – expert evidence – management in community – fixation with religion – fluctuation in extremist beliefs – significant mental illness – significant substance abuse disorder – treatment and rehabilitation programs – risks associated with deterioration of mental state and substance abuse – various measures to mitigate risk – whether offender poses unacceptable risk of committing serious Part 5.3 offence – whether each condition and combination of conditions is reasonably necessary and reasonably appropriate and adapted to protect the community from unacceptable risk Legislation Cited: Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (High Risk Terrorist Offenders) Bill 2021 (Cth) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 93C(1), 59(2), 326(1)(b), 530(1) Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), s 13(1) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), ss 6(3)(b), 5B(d), 7(4), 10(2), 11(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 9 Criminal Code (Cth), Div 105A, Pt 5.3, ss 101.4, 105A.3A, 105A.5, 105.6, 105A.6B, 105A.7, 105A.7A, 105A.7B, 105A9A, 105A.9B, 105A.10, 105A.11, 105A.13, 105A.18 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW), s 32 Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979 (NSW), s 6(1) Terrorism (High Risk Offenders) Act 2017 (NSW), ss 20(d), 23(3), 24(5), 26(7), 29(1) Cases Cited: Attorney General (Cth) v Pender (Preliminary) [2022] NSWSC 1360 Attorney-General (Cth) v Sa'adat Khan (No 2) [2022] VSC 687 Minister for Home Affairs v Pender [2021] NSWSC 1644 Minister for Home Affairs v Pender (Preliminary) [2021] NSWSC 921 Minister for Home Affairs in Benbrika [2020] VSC 888 New South Wales v Pacey (Final) [2015] NSWSC 1983 R v Pender [2019] NSWSC 1814 State of New South Wales v Naaman (No 2) [2018] NSWCA 328 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Australia (Plaintiff) Blake Nicholas Pender (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: P Herzfeld SC with Mr J Wherrett (Plaintiff) M Johnston SC with Mr D Bhutani (Defendant) File Number(s): 2022/270025 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate