NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: FC v SC [2022] NSWSC 1780 Hearing dates: 20, 21, 22, 23 & 24 June, and 7, 8, 13 & 14 July 2022 Date of orders: 15 December 2022 Decision date: 31 December 2022 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Slattery J Decision: Orders made pursuant to the NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009, s 41(1)(a) that the estate of the second defendant be subject to management under the Act. Other consequential orders made. Catchwords: MENTAL HEALTH - Protected Estates – the plaintiff applies for a declaration and orders under the New South Wales Trustee and Guardian Act 2009, s 41(1)(a) ("the TAG Act") that the estate of his father, the first defendant, be subject to management orders under the TAG Act – the first defendant is taken out of the jurisdiction by his nephew, the second defendant – the first defendant now lives with the second defendant – the plaintiff applies for declarations that various powers of attorney and enduring guardian appointments executed by the father are void and of no effect – whether the first defendant is a person "incapable of managing his or her affairs" – whether the estate of the first defendant should be subject to management under TAG Act. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 26 COVID-19 Legislation Amendment (Emergency Measures) Act 2020 Guardianship Act 1987 ss 4, 6H, 8, 15(3), 24 Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross Vesting Act) 1987 (NSW), s 9 Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross Vesting Act) 1987 (Qld), s 4 NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009, ss 41(1A), 41(2) Powers of Attorney Act 1998 (Qld), s 113 Powers of Attorney Act 2003, s 36 Cases Cited: Aboody v Ryan [2012] NSWCA 395 Aboody v Ryan [2012] NSWSC 136 Application of SG [2011] NSWSC 372 CD v EF [2018] NSWSC 848 CJ v AKJ [2015] NSWSC 498 EB v Guardianship Tribunal [2011] NSWSC 767 IR v AR [2015] NSWSC 1187 PY v RJS [1982] 2 NSWLR 700 Re B (No. 1) [2011] NSWSC 1075 Szozda v Szozda [2010] NSWSC 804 W v G (2003) 59 NSWLR 220 Texts Cited: Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England (9th ed, 1783, Printed for Strahan, Cadell, & Prince) H. S. Theobald, The Law Relating to Lunacy (1924, Stevens & Sons Ltd) Meagher Gummow and Lehane explain, W Gummow, M Leeming and P Turner, Meagher Gummow and Lehane's Equity Doctrines and Remedies, 5th edition, LexisNexis , [15-105] Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff: FC First Defendant: SC Second Defendant: JC Third Defendant: NSW Trustee and Guardian Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: Mr A. Crossland; Ms B. Flaherty First Defendant: Mr A. Galapo
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate