NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ashton v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2023] NSWCATAD 6 Hearing dates: 1 June 2022 Date of orders: 09 January 2023 Decision date: 09 January 2023 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: L Rogers, Senior Member Decision: The decision of the Respondent to revoke the Applicant's category ABG firearms licence is set aside. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW – Firearms Act 1996 – revocation of category ABG firearms licence – public safety – mental health condition and physical disability – "argumentative" interactions with inspecting Police officers Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 Firearms Act 1996 Firearms Regulation 2017 Cases Cited: AML v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2013] NSWADT 5 Cross v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2018] NSWCATAD 26 Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 46 FLR 409 Johns v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2021] NSWCATAD 283 Prevetera v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATAD 133 Sweet v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2000] NSWADT 185 Ward v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2000] NSWADT 28 Webb v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police [2004] NSWADT 110 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gregory Ashton (Applicant) Commissioner of Police (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self Represented) HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 2022/00039111 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate