NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: King v Insurance Australia Limited trading as NRMA Insurance [2023] NSWDC 26 Hearing dates: 24, 25, 26 August 2022, 2 December 2022 Date of orders: 17 February 2023 Decision date: 17 February 2023 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) Judgment for the defendant. (2) Costs reserved, with liberty to apply. (3) Exhibits retained until further order. Catchwords: INSURANCE - plaintiff makes an insurance claim using the Financial Services Ombudsman (FSO) after his home suffers flood damage - claim adjudicated subject to further expert reports being prepared and served - parties exchange expert reports and defendant makes offers based on those reports - plaintiff commences proceedings in the District Court of New South Wales - whether plaintiff entitled to commence such proceedings after their adjudication by the FSO - whether the FSO should have been joined as a party - whether the FSO had jurisdiction to determine the parties' dispute - alternatively, whether the damage was caused by the insured event - whether house built on shale or clay - expert evidence issues - quantum. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 56 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 1050 District Court Act 1973 (NSW), ss 4, 46, 134 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 136, 166(f) Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth), s 57 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 31.24, 31.27, 31.28, 42.35 Cases Cited: Arjunan v Neighbourhood Associates No DP 285853 [2022] NSWSC 691 Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223; [1947] 2 All ER 680 Australia Capital Management Pty Ltd v Australia Financial Complaints Authority [2022] NSWCA 204 Brambles Holdings Limited v Bathurst City Council [2001] NSWCA 61 Burge v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2017] FCA 1194 Burge v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (No 3) [2017] FCA 383 Cromwell Property Securities Ltd v Financial Services Ombudsman Ltd [2014] 288 FLR 374 Crowther v Whitehorse City Council (No 2) [2018] VSC 344 Esso Resources Pty Ltd v Southern Pacific Petroleum NL (Receivers and Managers Appointed) & Ors [2005] VSCA 228 Goldie Marketing Pty Ltd v Financial Ombudsman Services Ltd & Anor [2015] VSC 292 McDermott v Black (1940) 63 CLR 161 Mickovski v Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd (2012) 36 VR 456 Redman v Verticon Group Limited [2009] NSWDC 37 Tim Barr Pty Ltd v Narui Gold Coast Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 49 Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2004) 219 CLR 165 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Warren Sydney King (plaintiff) Insurance Australia Limited trading as NRMA Insurance (defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr J Sleight (plaintiff) Mr A Djurdjevic (defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate