NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Secretary, Department of Planning and Environment v Aerotropolis Pty Ltd [2023] NSWLEC 4 Hearing dates: 11 October 2022 Date of orders: 2 February 2023 Decision date: 02 February 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 5 Before: Moore J Decision: See orders at [146] Catchwords: PROSECUTIONS - multiple charges laid pursuant to the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 and the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (together the charge‑founding statutes) - charges required to be laid within two years of alleged offending conduct becoming known to an authorised officer - challenges to whether charges were laid prior to the expiry of the two‑year limitation period - two separate bases advanced by the Defendant as to why the prosecutions were commenced out of time - first basis that the day knowledge of the offending conduct coming to the attention of an authorised officer to be counted in the two‑year limitation period - second basis (if the first basis failed) was that the two-year time period expired on a Saturday and that the provisions of s 36(2) of the Interpretation Act 1987 (the Interpretation Act) were not available to the Prosecutor to extend the time for commencement of the prosecutions until the next available working day - question whether two-year limitation period included the day when the authorised officer became aware of the alleged offending conduct or whether that day was excluded from the two-year period - Defendant proposes that the day was included - inclusion of the day would mean that all the prosecutions were commenced out of time - day the authorised officer became aware of the alleged offending conduct not to be counted in the two-year period - consideration of whether the relevant provisions in the charge‑founding statutes ousted the operation of the Interpretation Act provision – time‑extending provision of the Interpretation Act not ousted - prosecutions all commenced within time - Defendant's Notice of Motion dismissed Legislation Cited: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s 36 Acts Interpretation Act 1931 (Tas), s 29 Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Qld), s 38 Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016, ss 2.2(1)(b), 2.4(1) and 13.4 Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 Criminal Procedure Act 1986, s 246(1)(a) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 127(5) Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984 (Vic), s 44 Interpretation Act 1978 (NT), s 28 Interpretation Act 1984 (WA), s 61 Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW), ss 5(2) and 36 Legislation Act 2001 (ACT), s 151A Legislation Interpretation Act 2021 (SA), s 44 National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, ss 118A(2), 118D(1) and 190 Cases Cited: Attorney-General (Cth) v Oates (1999) 198 CLR 162; [1999] HCA 35 Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage v Geoffrey Phillip Manchee; Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage v Bogamildi Investments Pty Ltd [2015] NSWLEC 117 Chief Executive of the Office of Environment and Heritage v Somerville [2019] NSWLEC 155 Dodds v Walker [1981] 1 WLR 1027 Environment Protection Authority v Truegain Pty Ltd (2013) 85 NSWLR 125; [2013] NSWCCA 204 Epacris Pty Limited v Director-General, Department of Natural Resources (2007) 69 NSWLR 507; [2007] NSWCCA 76 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89; [2007] HCA 22 Hill v Zuda Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 21 Lester v Garland (1808) 15 Ves Jun 248 Marshall v Director-General, Department of Transport (2001) 205 CLR 603; [2001] HCA 37 Morgans v Director of Public Prosecutions [1999] 2 Cr App R 99 Morton v Hampson [1962] VR 364 Price v JF Thompson (Qld) Pty Ltd [1990] 1 Qd R 278 R v A2 (2019) 269 CLR 507; [2019] HCA 35 SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2017) 262 CLR 362; [2017] HCA 34 Walker Corporation Pty Limited v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority (2008) 233 CLR 259; [2008] HCA 5 Wignalls Smallgoods Pty Ltd v Kent (2002) 10 Tas R 460; [2002] TASSC 67 Willoughby City Council v Screnci (2015) 213 LGERA 238; [2015] NSWLEC 192 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Secretary, Department of Planning and Environment (Prosecutor) Aerotropolis Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms N Sharp SC/Ms L Opper, barrister (Prosecutor) Mr P Herzfeld SC/Mr J Wherrett, barrister (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate