NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kitchingman v R [2023] NSWCCA 4 Hearing dates: 29 November 2022 Date of orders: 3 February 2023 Decision date: 03 February 2023 Before: Basten AJA at [1]; Dhanji J at [45]; R A Hulme AJ at [46] Decision: (1) Grant the applicant leave to appeal from the judgment in the District Court of 2 November 2022 refusing a permanent stay. (2) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME – procedure – interlocutory appeal – application for permanent stay – applicant unfit to stand trial – charge of buggery with child – special hearing to be conducted – refusal by trial judge to permanently stay proceedings – reliance on delay, cognitive impairment and physical infirmity – whether judge erred in not finding continuation of proceedings unacceptably unfair Legislation Cited: Bail Act 2013 (NSW), s 6(1) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 79 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Mental Health Act 1958 (NSW), ss 23, 24 Mental Health and Cognitive Impairment Forensic Provisions Act 2020 (NSW), ss 49-51; Pt 4, Div 3; ss 56(1), 57, 59, 63(2); Sch 2, cl 7 Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 (NSW) Pt 2, s 22A Cases Cited: Derley v R [2016] NSWCCA 60 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Jago v District Court of New South Wales (1989) 168 CLR 23; [1989] HCA 46 Moubarak bht Coorey v Holt (2019) 100 NSWLR 218; [2019] NSWCA 102 R v Edelsten (1989) 18 NSWLR 213 R v Mailes (2001) 53 NSWLR 251; [2001] NSWCCA 155 R v Steffan (1993) 30 NSWLR 633 R v WRC (2003) 59 NSWLR 273; [2003] NSWCCA 394 Subramaniam v The Queen (2004) 79 ALJR 116; [2004] HCA 51 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Allan Kitchingman (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Watts (Applicant) B Hatfield (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate