NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: PSG Security Group Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (No 2); ERA Security Group Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (No 2) [2023] NSWCATOD 11 Hearing dates: Determined on the papers Date of orders: 03 February 2023 Decision date: 03 February 2023 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: L Andelman, Senior Member Decision: (1) Under s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 the Tribunal dispenses with a hearing of the costs issue in this matter. (2) No order as to costs. Catchwords: LICENSING – Security Industry Act – security licence – fit and proper person COSTS – administrative review proceedings – no special circumstances Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: AIN v Medical Council of New South Wales [2015] NSWCATAP 241 PSG Security Group Pty Ltd and ERA Security Group Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Police [2022] NSWCATOD 164 Texts Cited: None Cited Category: Costs Parties: PSG Security Group Pty Ltd (Applicant) ERA Security Group Pty Ltd (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: E Vuu (Applicants) D Birch (Respondent)
Solicitors: McGirr & Associates (Applicants) Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 2022/00194998 2022/00195007 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate