NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: TJN Constructions Pty Ltd t/a Copperwood Construct v Karonen; Karonen v TJN Constructions Pty Ltd t/a Copperwood Construct (No 2) [2022] NSWCATCD 176 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 7 December 2022 Decision date: 07 December 2022 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: G Ellis SC, Senior Member Decision: In HB 21/25024: 1. Pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), the Tribunal dispenses with a hearing on the question of costs. 2. The first respondent is to pay 80% of the applicant's costs, on the ordinary basis, as agreed or assessed. In HB 21/40311: 1. Pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), the Tribunal dispenses with a hearing on the question of costs. 2. The applicant is to pay 80% of the respondent's costs, on the ordinary basis, as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: COSTS – Calderbank letters – whether offer unreasonably refused – consideration of circumstances at time when offer made COSTS – Sanderson order – whether to order the unsuccessful respondent pay the costs of the successful respondent – whether successful respondent reasonably joined – consideration of conduct of unsuccessful respondent Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 36 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW), cl 38 Cases Cited: ACQ v Cook (No 2) [2008] NSWCA 306 Actol Pty Ltd v Pro9 Systems Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATAP 225 Almeida v Universal Die Works Pty Ltd (No 2) [2001] NSWCA 156 Bonita v Shen [2016] NSWCATAP 159 Bullock v London General Omnibus Co [1907] 1 KB 264 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Gould v Vaggelas [1985] HCA 85; 157 CLR 215 Jones v Bradley (No 2) [2003] NSWCA 258 Lackersteen v Jones (No 2) (1988) 93 FLR 442 Latoudis v Casey [1990] HCA 59 Miwa Siantan Properties Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 344 News v Cotes [2019] NSWCATAP 186 Nu Line Construction Group Pty Ltd v Fowler [2012] NSWSC 816 Old v McInnes and Hogkinson [2011] NSWCA 410 Oshlak v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11 Sanderson v Blyth Theatre Co [1903] 2 KB 533 SMEC Testing Services Pty Ltd v Campbelltown City Council [2000] NSWCA 323 Stevedoring Industry Finance Committee v Gibson [2000] NSWCA 179 Thomas v SMP (International) No 5 [2010] NSWSC 1263 Thompson v Chapman [2016] NSWCATAP 6 Category: Costs Parties: HB 21/25024: Applicant – TJN Constructions Pty Ltd t/a Copperwood Construct Respondents – Heidi Karonen and Matthew Prentice
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate