NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Menassa v Shi [2023] NSWSC 54 Hearing dates: 6, 7 and 8 July 2022 Date of orders: 10 February 2023 Decision date: 10 February 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Henry J Decision: Order to be made pursuant to s 88K of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) imposing a drainage easement over the defendants' land. Catchwords: LAND LAW — Easements — application for easement under s 88K of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) — drainage easement associated with residential dual occupancy development — requirement for drainage easement by council's deferred commencement development condition — whether easement reasonably necessary for effective use or development of plaintiff's land — assessment of impact on defendants' land — whether easement over neighbouring land is viable alternative — whether plaintiff made all reasonable attempts to obtain easement — whether plaintiff provided sufficient information to enable the defendants to understand the proposal – where easement proposal modification made — whether discretion to impose easement should not be exercised due to plaintiff's conduct — where defendants raise procedural mistake by council — assessment of compensation — easement imposed Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 NSW Cases Cited: 117 York Street Pty Ltd v Proprietors of Strata Plan 16123 (1998) 43 NSWLR 504 City of Canterbury v Saad (2013) 195 LGERA 329; [2013] NSWCA 251 Community Association DP270447 v ATB Morton Pty Ltd (2019) 240 LGERA 32; [2019] NSWCA 83 Diro Group Pty Ltd v Leuzinger [2021] NSWLEC 107 Gordon v Lever (2018) 97 NSWLR 90; [2018] NSWCA 43 Gordon v Lever (No 2) (2019) 101 NSWLR 427; [2019] NSWCA 275 ING Bank (Aust) Ltd v O'Shea (2010) 14 BPR 27,317; [2010] NSWCA 71 Khattar v Wiese (2005) 12 BPR 23,235; [2005] NSWSC 1014 Lonergan v Lewis [2011] NSWSC 1133 McGrath v Mestousis [2017] NSWSC 995 Moorebank Recyclers Pty Ltd v Tanlane Pty Ltd (2012) 16 BPR 31,257; [2012] NSWCA 445 Rainbowforce Pty Ltd v Skyton Holdings Pty Ltd (2010) 171 LGERA 286; [2010] NSWLEC 2 Shi v Abi-K Pty Ltd (2014) 87 NSWLR 568; [2014] NSWCA 293 Studholme v Rawson [2020] NSWCA 76 The Owners – Strata Plan 85044 v Murrell; Murrell v The Owners – Strata Plan 85044 [2020] NSWSC 20 The Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (NSW) v Woollahra Municipal Council [2019] NSWLEC 1237 Weissflog v Community Association DP 270159 (2022) 20 BPR 42,265; [2022] NSWSC 239 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: Simon Pierrot Menassa (Plaintiff) Wenming Shi (First Defendant) Ping Wang (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms L Nurpuri (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate