NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Evans v R [2023] NSWCCA 11 Hearing dates: 19 September 2022 Date of orders: 10 February 2023 Decision date: 10 February 2023 Before: Bell CJ at [1] Price J at [9] Lonergan J at [161] Decision: (1) Extend the time for leave to appeal (2) Grant leave to appeal (3) Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - murder – issue at trial was presence of the accused – no directions sought for alternative verdict of manslaughter – tactical decision of trial counsel – two home invasions – coincidence evidence – consumption of ice – intoxication – whether evidence available to support verdict of manslaughter by unlawful and dangerous act – impermissible speculation or conjecture Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 18, 27, 86, 112, 421, 428A, 428B, 428C Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Sch 1 Supreme Court (Criminal Appeal) Rules 2021 (NSW) r 4.15 Cases Cited: Burns v The Queen (2012) 246 CLR 334; 86 ALJR 1097; 2017 A Crim R 501; [2012] HCA 35 Carbone v R [2020] NSWCCA 318 Douglass v R [2020] NSWCCA 284 James v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 475; 88 ALJR 427; 306 ALR 1; 236 A Crim R 402; [2014] HCA 6 Jones v Great Western Railway Co (1930) 144 LT 194 Lane v R (2013) 241 A Crim R 321; [2013] NSWCCA 317 Luxton v Vines (1952) 85 CLR 352; [1952] ALR 308; [1952] HCA 19 Pemble v The Queen (1971) 124 CLR 107; 45 ALJR 333; [1971] ALR 762; [1971] HCA 20 R v Basanovic (2018) 100 NSWLR 840; [2018] NSWCCA 246 R v Holzer [1968] VR 481 R v Johnson (No 4) [2017] NSWSC 609 R v Kanaan (2005) 157 A Crim R 238; 64 NSWLR 527; [2005] NSWCCA 385 Seltsam Pty Ltd v McGuiness (2002) 49 NSWLR 262; [2000] NSWCA 29 The Queen v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; 90 ALJR 1013; 334 ALR 234; 256 A Crim R 132; [2016] HCA 35 The Queen v Lavender (2005) 222 CLR 67; 218 ALR 521; 155 A Crim R 458; [2005] HCA 37 Wilson v The Queen (1992) 174 CLR 313; 66 ALJR 517; [1992] HCA 31 Xie v R [2022] NSWCCA 185 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ryan Evans (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: T Woods (Applicant) E Balodis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate