NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Kapua v R [2023] NSWCCA 14 Hearing dates: 10 October 2022 Decision date: 15 February 2023 Before: Simpson AJA at [1] Davies J at [42] Wilson J at [43] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal is granted; 2. The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME – APPEAL – appeal against sentence – attempt obtain financial advantage by deception – obtain property by deception - multiple counts – attempted fraud using "stolen" identities – multiple victims - deal with proceeds of crime – question of treatment of mental condition – assessment of objective gravity – question of manifest excess Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Cases Cited: Anderson v R [2022] NSWCCA 187 Apulu v R [2022] NSWCCA 244 Barbieri v R {2016] NSWCCA 295 Betts v The Queen (2018) 258 CLR 420; [2018] HCA 25 Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571; [2013] HCA 37 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 DS v R; DM v R [2022] NSWCCA 156 Gaffney v R [2009] NSWCCA 160 Johnston v R [2017] NSWCCA 53 Kentwell v The Queen [2014] 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 McKittrick v R [2014] NSWCCA 128 McLaren v R [2021] NSWCCA 12 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 244 CLR 120 Pereira v R [2018] NSWCCA 171 R v Burke [2002] NSWCCA 353 R v Deng [2007] NSWCCA 216; (2007) 176 A Crim R 1 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; [1999] NSWCCA 111 R v Israil [2002] NSWCCA 255 R v Lauritsen [2000] WASCA 3; (2000) 114 A Crim R 333 R v Schofield (2003) 138 A Crim R 19; [2003] NSWCCA 3 R v SS (a pseudonym) [2022] NSWCCA 258 R v Stonestreet [2020] NSWCCA 212 R v Taouk (1992) 65 A Crim R 387 R v Whyte [2019] NSWCCA 218 R v Doorey [2000] NSWCCA 456 Rossal v R [2021] NSWCCA 200 Salafia v R [2015] NSWCCA 141 Siwek v R [2017] NSWCCA 178 Stroud v R [2019] NSWCCA 249 Towse v R [2022] NSWCCA 252 Williams v R [2021] NSWCCA 15 Category: Principal judgment Parties: M Kapua (Applicant) The King (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A McGrath (Applicant) E Wilkins SC (Respondent) (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate