NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Sahab Holdings Pty Ltd v Tonks [2023] NSWCA 12 Hearing dates: 19 October 2022 Date of orders: 15 February 2023 Decision date: 15 February 2023 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1] Meagher JA at [2] Kirk JA at [3] Decision: (1) Dismiss the appeal (2) Order the appellant to pay the respondents' costs Catchwords: CORPORATIONS — Receivers and managers — Application for inquiry under s 423(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) — Language of "prima facie case" to be avoided — Whether receivers obliged to defend proceedings against company — Leave required to compromise a claim — Whether receivers entitled to use litigation as a means to seek to renegotiate a pre-existing contractual relationship — Receivers' approach manifested a reasonable commercial judgment in the circumstances — Appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 420, s 423, s 536, s 90-10 of Sch 2 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 67, 68 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, Pt 26 Cases Cited: BL & GY International Co Ltd v Hypec Electronics Pty Ltd (2010) 79 ACSR 558; [2010] NSWSC 959 Burns Philp Investments Pty Ltd v Dickens (1993) 11 ACLC 272 Djordjevich v Rohrt [2022] VSCA 84 Hall v Poolman (2009) 75 NSWLR 99; [2009] NSWCA 64 Kanjian Holdings No 1 Pty Ltd v Kanjian; Kanjian v Kanjian (No 3) [2021] NSWSC 839 Kanjian v Kanjian (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 14 Kanjian v Kanjian [2019] NSWSC 166 Leslie v Hennessy [2001] FCA 371 Naxatu Pty Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd (2012) 207 FCR 507; [2012] FCAFC 163 Northbourne Developments Pty Ltd v Reiby Chambers Pty Ltd (1989) 19 NSWLR 434 Re St Gregory's Armenian School (in liq) (2012) 92 ACSR 588; [2012] NSWSC 1215 Senses Northbridge Pty Ltd v Sahab Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 1458 Senses Northbridge Pty Ltd v Sahab Holdings Pty Ltd (No 3) [2020] NSWSC 345 Senses Northbridge Pty Ltd v Sahab Holdings Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1201 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sahab Holdings Pty Ltd (Appellant) Bradley John Tonks (First Respondent) Mark Roufeil (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: AJL Bannon SC / MR Davis (Appellant) R Glasson (Respondents)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate