NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Fantakis v R (No 2) [2023] NSWCCA 22 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 15 February 2023 Decision date: 15 February 2023 Before: Ward ACJ; Rothman J; Dhanji J Decision: The application to set aside or vary the orders made by the Court on 3 February 2023 is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME — Application to vary or set aside orders dismissing conviction appeal Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Supreme Court (Criminal Appeal) Rules 2021 Cases Cited: Chiro v The Queen (2017) 260 CLR 425; [2017] HCA 37 Country Care Group Pty Ltd v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (2020) 275 FCR 342; [2020] FCAFC 30 Fantakis v R [2023] NSWCCA 3 Gould v R; R v Gould [2021] NSWCCA 92 Jones v The Queen (1989) 166 CLR 409; [1989] HCA 16 Lane v The Queen (2018) 265 CLR 196; [2018] HCA 28 Pantorno v The Queen (1989) 166 CLR 466; [1989] HCA 18 R v Jones (No 2) (2010) 79 NSWLR 143; [2010] NSWCCA 195 R v Koko [2022] QCA 216 R v Lapa (No 2) (1995) 80 A Crim R 398 R v Zaiter [2004] NSWCCA 35 Royall v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 378; [1991] HCA 27 Ryan v The Queen (1967) 121 CLR 205; [1967] HCA 2 Category: Consequential orders Parties: Elefterios (Terry) Fantakis (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: M Ramage QC with T Woods (Applicant) (on grounds 1 and 2 only) E Fantakis (Applicant – self represented on remaining grounds) M Millward (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate