NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cherry v Point to Point Transport Commissioner [2022] NSWCATOD 193 Hearing dates: 15 March 2022 Date of orders: 21 April 2022 Decision date: 21 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: L Pearson, Principal Member Decision: (1) Pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 a hearing is dispensed with.
(2) The application for administrative review lodged on 10 February 2022 is dismissed.
(3) The application for an order under s 60 of the Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 is dismissed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW – taxi driver – disqualifying offences – no administratively reviewable decision Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997(NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Records Act 1991 (NSW) Point to Point Transport (Taxis and Hire Vehicles) Act 2016 (NSW) Point to Point Transport (Taxis and Hire Vehicles) Regulation 2017 (NSW) Cases Cited: CTU v NSW Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 204 EGJ v Point to Point Transport Commissioner [2020] NSWCATOD 29 Tabbaa v NJSW Taxi Council [2020] NSWCATAD 46 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mark Cherry (Applicant) Point to Point Transport Commissioner (Respondent) Representation: Applicant self-represented J Blacklaws, Legal Counsel – Regulatory, Point to Point Transport Commissioner (Respondent) File Number(s): 2022/00043100
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate