NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Honeysett (No 2) (Sentence) [2023] NSWSC 103 Hearing dates: 13 and 14 February 2023 Date of orders: 14 February 2023 Decision date: 14 February 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Hamill J Decision: Mr Honeysett is sentenced to a period of imprisonment of 1 year and 6 months commencing on 10 October 2020 and expiring on 9 April 2022, with a non-parole period of 1 year commencing on 10 October 2020 and expiring on 9 October 2021. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – attempted robbery in company – cognitively impaired offender – limited role in planning – significant role in attack – use of weapons – serious example of robbery in company – where victim died of stab wounds inflicted by co-offender – where murder charge withdrawn on entry of plea – death of victim disregarded in sentencing – sentencing discount – prescriptive statutory scheme – prosecution concession accepted – 25% discount allowed – deprivation and intellectual disability – "scandalous neglect of young Indigenous people" – reduction in moral culpability – parity – where second co-offender received intensive correction order on undertaking to assist prosecution – same starting point appropriate – where offender in custody awaiting murder trial for over two years – full time custodial sentence only appropriate disposition – backdating sentence – time served sufficient Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 NSW, s 97(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 10A, 25D, 25E Cases Cited: Black v R [2022] NSWCCA 17 Bresnahan v R [2022] NSWCCA 288 Green v R [2022] NSWCCA 230 Ke v R [2021] NSWCCA 177 R v Camilleri [2021] NSWSC 221 R v Cardoso [2003] NSWCCA 15 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346; [1999] NSWCCA 111 R v Honeysett [2023] NSWSC 76 R v Rifai [2022] NSWDC 74 R v Tailford (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 695 Regina v Darrell Terry McNaughton (2006) 66 NSWLR 566; [2006] NSWCCA 242 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465; [1988] HCA 14 Category: Sentence Parties: Rex (Crown) Jye Honeysett (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: S Baumgarten (Crown) R Mathur SC (Honeysett)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate