NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Peter Fryar trading as Key Urban Planning v Central Coast Council [2023] NSWLEC 1079 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 17 February 2023 Date of orders: 21 February 2023 Decision date: 21 February 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Gray C Decision: The Court orders that: (1) Leave is granted to the Applicant to amend Development Application No. 1923/2021, to rely on the amended plans and documents specified in Annexure A. (2) Pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away as a result of order (1) in the sum of $5,000.00 within 28 days of the date of this order. (3) The appeal is upheld. (4) Development Application No. 1923/2021 for alterations and additions to a former cinema building to provide a mixed use development comprising five retail shops at ground floor level; seven office suites at first floor level; the construction of an additional floor containing a four bedroom dwelling; rooftop plant and services and open space for the dwelling; and associated parking and engineering works is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions set out in Annexure B. Catchwords: APPEAL – development application – alterations and additions to a former cinema for the purpose of retail, commercial and shop top housing – conciliation conference – agreement reached – orders made Legislation Cited: Central Coast Local Environmental Plan 2022 cl 1.8A Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.15, 4.16, 8.7, 8.15 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cl 55, Sch 1 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34 State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021 ss 2.10, 2.12, 4.6 Wyong Local Environmental Plan 2013 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Fryar trading as Key Urban Planning (Applicant) Central Coast Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H Howard (Applicant) A Rutherford (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate