NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Shoal Bay Beach Constructions No. 1 Pty Ltd v Mark Hickey & the persons listed in Schedule A to the Notice of Appeal trading as Sparke Helmore [2023] NSWCA 23 Hearing dates: 21 June 2022 Decision date: 22 February 2023 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [3]; White JA at [8] Decision: (1) Appeal dismissed with costs. (2) Cross-appeal allowed with costs. (3) Set aside the orders of the court below of 26 November 2021 and 9 December 2021. (4) In lieu thereof, order that the proceedings be dismissed with costs. Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE – professional negligence – duty to advise – scope of solicitors' duty to advise property developer – where client suffers loss in the form of rescinded contracts for the sale of off-the-plan units upon failing to give timely notice of extension of time for completion – where client alleges that that loss was caused by solicitors' failure to advise of time within which client had the right to extend Registration Date and to seek instructions – where solicitors had previously advised officers of client of time limit within which right to extend contracts needed to be exercised – whether failure to reiterate or repeat advice closer to expiry of time limit constitutes breach of duty to advise – whether apparent that officers of client misunderstood previous advice –– held no breach of duty to advise by failure to reiterate advice previously imparted APPEALS – notice of contention – attempt to raise issue not agitated at first-instance – where appellant sought to establish respondents' liability in negligence on alternative basis from that contended at trial – whether alternative basis should be permitted – held impermissible for appellant to raise new ground of liability on appeal where respondents would be prejudiced – no issue of principle Cases Cited: Capebay Holdings Pty Ltd v Sands [2002] WASC 287 Fitzwood Pty Ltd v Unique Goal Pty Ltd (in liq) [2001] FCA 1628; (2001) 188 ALR 566 Groom v Crocker [1939] 1 KB 194 Heydon v NRMA Ltd (2000) 51 NSWLR 1; [2000] NSWCA 374 Midland Bank Trust Co Ltd v Hett, Stubbs & Kemp (a Firm) [1979] Ch 384 Nigam v Harm (No 2) [2011] WASCA 221 Scottsdale Homes Pty Ltd v Gemkip Pty Ltd [2008] QSC 326 Yager v Fishman & Co and Teff & Teff [1944] 1 All ER 552 Texts Cited: R J Jackson QC & J L Powell (General Editors), Jackson & Powell on Professional Negligence (3rd ed, 1992, Sweet & Maxwell) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Shoal Bay Beach Constructions No.1 Pty Ltd (Appellant/Cross Respondent) Mark Hickey and the persons listed in Schedule A to the Statement of Claim trading at all material times as Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Respondents/Cross Appellants) Representation: Counsel: D S Weinberger (Appellant/Cross Respondent) A R Zahra SC with J S Burnett (Respondents/Cross Appellants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate