NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Russell (No 2) [2022] NSWSC 1793 Hearing dates: 20-21 April 2022 Date of orders: 21 April 2022 Decision date: 21 April 2022 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Cavanagh J Decision: 1) The accused's application to admit tendency evidence pursuant to the tendency notice is accepted. 2) The accused's application to exclude evidence previously given by a witness, Mr Bangel, is rejected. Catchwords: EVIDENCE — Tendency evidence — Criminal proceedings – significant probative value – reasonable notice EVIDENCE — Discretions — Application to exclude evidence – where witness' evidence had previously been given by audio-visual recording – where evidence later adduced by the Crown had not been put to witness during recording of evidence – whether Crown was under an obligation to disclose that evidence Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s 146 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 97, 100 Cases Cited: Gardiner v Regina (2006) 162 A Crim R Hughes v R (2017) 263 CLR 338 IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; [2016] HCA 14 R v Bryce (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 498 R v Cittadini [2008] NSWCCA 256 R v Lockyer (1996) 89 A Crim R 457 R v Sharpe (No 5) [2021] NSWSC 52 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Eric George Russell (Accused) Representation: Counsel: C Taylor (Crown) P Coady (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate