NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Unified Security Group (Australia) Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Police [2021] NSWCATOD 227 Hearing dates: 20 April 2021 Date of orders: 21 April 2021 Decision date: 06 May 2021 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: L Pearson, Principal Member Decision: (1) The objection by Unified Security Group (Australia) Pty Ltd to production of the documents specified in item 1(d) and item 6 of Annexure A to the Summons to Produce issued on 8 April 2021 is dismissed. (2) An order is made pursuant to s 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 that access to the documents produced is restricted to the Respondent and its legal representatives, for use only for purposes directly connected with these proceedings. Catchwords: INTERLOCUTORY ORDER – summons to produce documents – objection – whether legitimate forensic purpose Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Security Industry Act 1997 Cases Cited: Botany Bay Instrumentation & Control Pty Ltd v Stewart [1984] 3 NSWLR 98 Plate Glass Holdings Pty Ltd v Fraser Gordon Investments Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1487 Rhinehart v Rhinehart [2018] NSWSC 1102 Trade Practices Commission v Arnotts Ltd (No 2) (1989) 21 FCR 306 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Unified Security Group (Australia) Pty Ltd (Applicant) Commissioner of Police (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: J Alderson (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate