R v Schifilliti [2022] NSWDC 704

District Court New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Schifilliti [2022] NSWDC 704 Hearing dates: 23, 24 and 25 March 2022 Date of orders: 25 March 2022 Decision date: 25 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Sutherland SC DCJ Decision: Evidence of relationship / Context evidence admissible At [80] That there is not a miscarriage of justice which is clear and evident, in the event of the admissibility of the evidence dealt with by Syme DCJ, that in fact, her Honour, for the reasons that she articulated, reached an appropriate conclusion. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE — Trial — Case management — Pre-trial hearing – admissibility of relationship evidence – relationship evidence – context evidence – Pre-trial ruling by different Judge Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Surveillance Devices Act 2007 (NSW) Cases Cited: DJV v R [2008] NSWCCA 272 Gipp v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 106 Harriman v R [1989] HCA 50; (1989) 167 CLR 590 Herron v The Attorney General for New South Wales (1987) 8 NSWLR 601 HML v The Queen; SB v R; OAE v R [2008] HCA 16; 235 CLR 334 Josifoski v The Queen (1997) 2 VR 68 KJS v R [2014] NSWCCA 27 KTR v R [2010] NSWCCA 271 Landsman v R [2014] NSWCCA 328 Norman v R [2012] NSWCCA 230 Pfennig v The Queen [1995] HCA 7; (1995) 182 CLR 461 Qualtieri v R [2006] NSWCCA 95; (2006) 171 A Crim R 463 R v A (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 76 R v AN [2000] NSW CCA 372; 117 A Crim R 176 R v AN (No 2)[2015] NSWSC 308 R v Atroushi (2001) NSWCCA 406 R v Belghar [2012] NSWCCA 86 R v Etherington (1982) 32 SASR 230 R v Yates [2002] NSWCCA 520 Re Mickelberg (1992) 59 A Crim R 288 RG v R [2010] NSWCCA 173 Wilson v The Queen [1970] HCA 17; (1970) 123 CLR 334 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: ODPP (Crown) Schifilliti (Accused) Representation: Counsel: