NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: BCFK Holdings Pty Ltd v Rork Projects Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 185 Hearing dates: 24 February 2023 Decision date: 03 March 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity - Technology and Construction List Before: Stevenson J Decision: That there be no order as to costs Catchwords: COSTS – whether plaintiff should have its costs in circumstances where plaintiff successful but on a basis of a submission as to whether payment claim had been effectively served opposite to the position maintained at the time Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: A v The Governor of Arbour Hill Prison [2006] 4 IR 88 BCFK Holdings Pty Ltd v Rork Projects Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1706 Cadder v Her Majesty's Advocate [2010] UKSC 43; [2010] 1 WLR 2601 Esso Australia Resources Australia Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49; [1999] HCA 67 Lazarus v Independent Commissioner Against Corruption (2017) 94 NSWLR 36; [2017] NSWCA 37 Piety Constructions Pty Ltd v Hville FCP Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 1318 Roberts v White [1999] NSWCA 12 Sinkovich v Attorney General of New South Wales (2013) 85 NSWLR 783; [2013] NSWCA 383 Category: Costs Parties: BCFK Holdings Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Rork Projects Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Navid King (Second Defendant) Adjudicate Today Pty Ltd (Third Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D S Weinberger (Plaintiff) F Corsaro SC (First Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate