NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Conway v R [2023] NSWCCA 40 Hearing dates: 10 August 2022 Decision date: 10 March 2023 Before: Ward P at [1]; Davies J at [2]; Button J at [3] Decision: 1. Leave to appeal against conviction granted. 2. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIME - appeals - appeal against conviction – offences arising from fatal head-on motor vehicle collision – primary offence manslaughter – judge alone trial – whether any conviction unreasonable or unable to be supported – brief discussion of correct approach to ground when trial conducted by judge alone – circumstantial case that applicant was driver at time of collision – whether reasonable alternative hypothesis that someone else was the driver – some evidence to support proposition that two persons were in the vehicle at the time of collision – ancillary ground impugning verdict of guilty on count that required applicant to have taken the motor vehicle without consent – detailed analysis of evidence – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) s 166 Cases Cited: Dansie v The Queen [2022] HCA 25; (2022) 403 ALR 21 Filippou v The Queen (2015) 256 CLR 47; [2015] HCA 29 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 R v Conway [2020] NSWDC 816 The Queen v Baden-Clay (2016) 258 CLR 308; [2016] HCA 35 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Sam Conway (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: K Averre (Applicant) C Curtis (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate