NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: FRW v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2023] NSWCATOD 21 Hearing dates: 14 and 15 March 2022 Date of orders: 30 January 2023 Decision date: 30 January 2023 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: J Gatland, Senior Member Decision: 1. The decision under review is affirmed. Catchwords: OCCUPATIONS — Other occupations —security licence – whether security licence should be granted – whether fit and proper person – whether in the public interest Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Crimes Act 1990 (NSW) Mental Health Act 2007 (NSW) Security Industry Act 1997 (NSW) Cases Cited: Ahmed v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 73 Austin v Commissioner of Fair Trading [2016] NSWCATAP 179 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321; [1990] HCA 33 Australian Communications and Media Authority v Today FM (Sydney) Pty Ltd (2015) 255 CLR 352; [2015] HCA 7 Avilion Group Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Police [2010] NSWCA 275 Banerjee v Commissioner of Police (2018) 98 NSWLR 730; [2018] NSWCA 283 Blissett v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police; Web Protection Australia Pty Limited v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police [2006] NSWADT 114 Bronze Wing International Pty Limited v SafeWork NSW [2017] NSWCA 42 Comalco Aluminium (Bell Bay) Ltd v O'Connor & Ors (1995) 61 IR 455; (1995) 131 ALR 657 Commissioner of Police v Toleafoa [1999] NSWADTAP 9 Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force v Mercer [2005] NSWADTAP 55 Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force v Fakhouri [2021] NSWCATAP 226 Constantin v Commissioner of Police [2013] NSWATAP 16 Esterman v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2014] NSWCATOD 70 Ex parte Meagher (1919) 336 WN(NSW) 175 Feuerstein v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2007] NSWADT 114 Hailes v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2022] NSWCATAD 37 Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No.2) [1955] HCA 28 IJ v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2003] NSWADT 230 Joseph v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2017] NSWCA 31 Keegan-Jaques v Commissioner of Police [2017] NSWCATAD 145 Laing v Commissioner of Police New South Wales Police Force [2017] NSWCATAD 315 Manning v Commissioner of Police [2020] NSWCATAD 111 McDonald v Director-General of Social Security (1984) 1 FCR 354; [1984] FCA 57 Nakad v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2014] NSWCATAP 10 Nakad v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2013] NSWADT 169 Nastav v Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force [2018] NSWCATOD 71 O'Sullivan v Farrer (1989) 168 CLR 210; [1989] HCA 61 Roberts v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2016] NSWCATAD 218 Smith v Commissioner of Police & Commissioner for Fair Trading [2014] NSWCATAD 184 Texts Cited: Australia, Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, Final Report, Volume 4 Identifying and disclosing child sexual abuse (December 2017) Category: Principal judgment Parties: FRW (Applicant) Commissioner for Police, NSW Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Applicant (Self-represented) Bartier Perry (Respondent) File Number(s): 2021/00116579 Publication restriction: Pursuant to s64(1)(a) of the CAT Act, the disclosure of the name of the Applicant and all witnesses in these proceedings is prohibited.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate