NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: La Rocca v R [2023] NSWCCA 45 Hearing dates: 3 March 2023 Date of orders: 10 March 2023 Decision date: 10 March 2023 Before: Bell CJ at [1]; Davies J at [66]; N Adams J at [67] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Allow the appeal. 3. Set aside the notice of motion for a permanent stay of proceedings. 4. Order that that the proceedings be permanently stayed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE – where permanent stay of criminal proceedings sought - inherent power to prevent abuse of process - whether administration of justice would be brought into disrepute if proceedings permitted to continue – external appearance of consignment altered causing conceded incurable disadvantage to accused - where conduct of police deprived applicant of practical ability to seek to argue statutory defence – whether primary judge's exercise of discretion in refusing stay of proceedings miscarried Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 5F(3) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) ss 11.1(1) and 307.5(1) Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997 (NSW) s 13(a) Cases Cited: Barton v The Queen (1980) 147 CLR 75; [1980] HCA 48 Bunning v Cross (1978) 141 CLR 54; [1978] HCA 22 Dupas v The Queen (2010) 241 CLR 237; [2010] HCA 20 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Jago v District Court (NSW) (1989) 168 CLR 23; [1989] HCA 46 La Rocca v R [2021] NSWCCA 116 Lee v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 455; [2014] HCA 20 Moti v The Queen (2011) 245 CLR 456; [2011] HCA 50 R v Glennon (1992) 173 CLR 592; [1992] HCA 16 R v Grant [2009] 2 SCR 353 R v Horseferry Road Magistrates' Court; ex parte Bennett [1994] 1 AC 42 Ridgeway v The Queen (1995) 184 CLR 19; [1995] HCA 66 Rogers v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 251; [1994] HCA 42 Strickland (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (2018) 266 CLR 325; [2018] HCA 53 Truong v The Queen (2004) 223 CLR 122; [2004] HCA 10 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jason La Rocca (Applicant) The Crown (Respondent) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate