NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Halligan v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2019] NSWCATOD 202 Hearing dates: 12 December 2019 Date of orders: 30 December 2019 Decision date: 30 December 2019 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Naida Isenberg, Senior Member Decision: (1) The application for review is dismissed pursuant to s 55(1)(b) of the CAT Act. Catchwords: Security licence – mandatory revocation – application by Respondent to dismiss the Application for Review – whether application "otherwise misconceived or lacking in substance Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Security Industry Act 1997 (NSW) Security Industry Regulation 2016 (NSW) Cases Cited: Alchin v Rail Corporation NSW [2012] NSWADT 142 BDK v Department of Education and Communities [2015] NSWCATAP 129 Bourke v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales [1998] NSWADT, unreported Henkelman v Psychology Council of NSW [2017] NSWCATOD 161 La Macchia v Minister for Primary Industry [1986] FCA 452; (1986) 72 ALR 23 Lokondo v Commissioner of Police [2017] NSWCATAP 137 Texts Cited: None cited Category: Principal judgment Parties: Stephen Halligan (Applicant) Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate