NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Nguyen v Department of Fair Trading [2019] NSWCATOD 204 Hearing dates: 1 April 2019 Date of orders: 26 April 2019 Decision date: 26 April 2019 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Emeritus Prof G D Walker, Senior Member Decision: (1) The determination under review is set aside. (2) A tattooist licence is to be issued to the applicant. (3) The licence referred to in (2) is to be subject to a condition requiring total abstinence from all or any prohibited drugs. Catchwords: LICENSING – tattooists – fit and proper person – public interest – drug conviction – rehabilitation – licence condition. Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 (NSW) Tattoo Parlours Regulation 2013 (NSW). Cases Cited: Allen v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2015] NSWCATAD 273; Austin v Commissioner for Fair Trading and Commissioner of Police [2016] NSWCATAP 179; Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond(1990) 170 CLR 321; Butler v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATAD 138; Comalco Aluminium (Bell Bay) Ltd v O'Connor (1995) 131 ALR 657; Commissioner of Police v Toleafoa [1999] NSWADTAP 9; Constantin v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force [2013] NSWADTAP 16; Dessman v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2015] NSWCATAD 255; Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 2 ALD 60; Director of Public Prosecutions v Smith [1991] Vic Rep 6, (1991) 1 VR 63; Health Care Complaints Commission v Do [2014] NSWCA 307; Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No. 2) (1955) 93 CLR 127; Moujalli v Roads and Maritime Services [2017] NSWCATAD 141; Naziry v Director-General, Department of Transport [2004] NSWADT 40; Project Blue Sky Inc. v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28, (1998) 194 CLR 355; Saadieh v Director-General, Department of Transport [1999] NSWADT 68; Smith v Commissioner of Police [2014] NSWCATAD 184; Sobey v Commercial and Private Agents Board (1979) 22 SASR 70; Stiles v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATAP 44; Wright v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2017] NSWCATAD 98. Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Jason Nguyen (Applicant) Department of Fair Trading (First Respondent) Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Force (Second Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: J Nguyen (Self Represented)(Applicant) Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondents) File Number(s): 2018/00372683
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate