NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Thomas and Naaz Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2023] NSWCA 40 Hearing dates: 3 March 2023 Decision date: 14 March 2023 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [2]; Griffiths AJA at [75] Decision: Dismiss the summons filed 3 August 2022 seeking leave to appeal, with costs. Catchwords: TAXES AND DUTIES – payroll tax – taxable wages – relevant contracts – taxpayer operated medical centres – taxpayer contracted with medical practitioners to practise at centres on terms that medical practitioners would pay 30% of medicare benefits received to applicant – taxpayer made claims on Medicare on behalf of most medical practitioners and remitted 70% to them – whether amounts paid by taxpayer to medical practitioners deemed to be taxable wages – whether medical practitioners supplied services to taxpayer – whether payments made for or in relation to the performance of work relating to relevant contract – whether determination by NCAT that medical practitioners supplied services to taxpayer (as well as to patients) gave rise to any question of law Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 80(2)(b), 83 Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth), s 20A Payroll Tax Act 2007 (NSW), Pt 3, Div 7, ss 8, 10, 11, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, Sch 1 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), ss 48(1)(a)(vii), 48(2)(f) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 50.4, 51.18(1)(e) Cases Cited: Accident Compensation Commission v Odco Pty Ltd [1990] HCA 43; 64 ALJR 606 Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Booth v Fourmeninapub Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 57 Commissioner of State Revenue v The Optical Superstore Pty Ltd [2019] VSCA 197; 110 ATR 651 Da Costa v The Queen (1968) 118 CLR 186; [1968] HCA 51 Federated Engine-Drivers and Firemen's Association of Australasia v Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd (1911) 12 CLR 398; [1911] HCA 31 Ferella v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2014] NSWCA 378; 96 ATR 875 Homefront Nursing Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of Statute Revenue [2019] NSWCATAD 145 Orr v Cobar Management Pty Ltd (2020) 103 NSWLR 36; [2020] NSWCCA 220 Schwartz Family Co Pty Ltd v Capitol Carpets Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 223 Smith's Snackfood Co Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2013] NSWCA 470; 97 ATR 904 Thomas and Naaz Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2022] NSWCATAP 220 Thomas and Naaz Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2021] NSWCATAD 259 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Thomas and Naaz Pty Ltd (Applicant) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: R L Seiden SC with P R Glissan (Applicant) S Balafoutis SC with A Gerard (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate