NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Dempsey [2023] NSWSC 205 Hearing dates: 03 February 2023 Date of orders: 17 March 2023 Decision date: 17 March 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Hamill J Decision: The offender is sentenced to imprisonment for 19 years and 9 months, with a non-parole period of 14 years and 6 months. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – murder – brutal and sustained attack on former domestic partner – culminating in hard blow with hammer or similar weapon to the back of head – victim left in bathtub – whether death by drowning – impact on assessment of objective criminality – victim impact statements – sisters caring for young children of deceased – courage and resilience – relevance of impact on sentence – deterrence – victim entitled to leave area and move to country with children – no mitigation in offender's love for children or fear of losing them – increased need for deterrence in such circumstances – offence in victim's home an aggravating feature – use of weapon – dysfunctional childhood – relevance to sentencing – history provided to psychologist – evidence accepted – reduction in moral culpability – not relevant to objective gravity – mid-range of objective seriousness – appropriate sentence – special circumstances – modest adjustment to non-parole period Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987, s 15A Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW), s 25C(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), Pt 3 Div 2, Table to Pt 4 Div 1A, ss 21A(2)(c), 21A(2)(eb), 21A(2)(k), 21A(3)(i), 30E(3) Cases Cited: Cargnello v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2012] NSWCCA 162; (2012) 224 A Crim R 204 Devaney v R [2012] NSWCCA 285 DH v R [2022] NSWCCA 200 Lechmana v R [2019] NSWCCA 112 Lloyd v R [2022] NSWCCA 18 Munda v Western Australia (2013) 249 CLR 600; [2013] HCA 38 R v Ahmed (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 105 R v Halloun [2014] NSWSC 1705 R v Hamid [2006] NSWCCA; (2006) 164 A Crim R 179 R v Haydar (No 4) [2017] NSWSC 615 R v Hines (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 1273 R v Johnson [2015] NSWSC 31 R v Latu (No 3) [2019] NSWSC 951 R v Lechmana [2010] NSWSC 849 R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353; (2001) 127 A Crim R 369 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rex (Prosecution) Rodney Dempsey (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: N Marney (Prosecution) T Warr (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate