NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Bowie [2023] NSWSC 207 Hearing dates: 03 March 2023 Date of orders: 17 March 2023 Decision date: 17 March 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Yehia J Decision: Sentenced to a non-parole period of 18 years, commencing on 5 October 2019, and expiring on 4 October 2037, with an additional term of six years' imprisonment. The total term of imprisonment is 24 years, expiring on 4 October 2043 Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW — Murder — Murder of wife — Intention to kill — Disposal of wife's body in such a way to elude detection — 40 years between commission of the offence and sentence — 72-year-old offender with medical conditions that can be treated in custody — Objectively serious offence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 18(1)(a) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) s 25C Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 21B, 61(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment Act 2022 (NSW) sch 2 Cases Cited: Barbaro v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 58; [2014] HCA 2 Bektasovski v R [2022] NSWCCA 246 Cherry v R [2017] NSWCCA 150 DH v R [2022] NSWCCA 200 Gulyas v Western Australia [2007] WASCA 263; 178 A Crim R 539 Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Liu v R [2023] NSWCCA 30 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 McKinnan v R [2020] NSWCCA 106 Munda v Western Australia (2013) 249 CLR 600; [2013] HCA 38 Park v R [2019] NSWCCA 105 Quinn v R [2018] NSWCCA 297 R v Blanco (1999) 106 A Crim R 202; [1999] NSWCCA 121 R v Bowie (No 4) [2022] NSWSC 1505 R v Bunce [2007] NSWSC 469 R v Burrell [2008] NSWSC 30 R v Cavkic (No 2) [2009] VSCA 43 R v Dawson [2022] NSWSC 1632 R v Dukagjini (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 1668 R v Edwards [2019] NSWSC 1815 R v Hickson (No 4) [2020] NSWSC 340 R v Lane [2011] NSWSC 289 R v Raju [2007] NSWSC 1418 R v Smith (No 4) [2011] NSWSC 1082 R v Stone [2004] NSWSC 224 R v Warwick (No 94) [2020] NSWSC 1168 R v Wilkinson [2009] NSWSC 432 Rogerson v R; McNamara v R [2021] NSWCCA 160 Scott v R [2020] NSWCCA 81 The Queen v Pham (2015) 256 CLR 550; [2015] HCA 39 Category: Sentence Parties: Rex (Crown) John Douglas Bowie (Offender) Representation: Counsel: A Morris (Crown) W Terracini SC and K Ng (Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate