NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: XY (A Pseudonym) v R [2023] NSWCCA 50 Hearing dates: 09 September 2022 Date of orders: 17 March 2023 Decision date: 17 March 2023 Before: Kirk JA at [1] Harrison J at [2] Wright J at [3] Decision: (1) The applicant has leave to appeal. (2) The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – appeal against sentence – aggregate sentence for commercial and large commercial drug supply and firearms offences – whether sentencing judge erroneously applied sentencing discounts to the aggregate sentence and not the indicative sentence – discount not applied to aggregate sentence rather than indicative sentences – whether aggregate sentence manifestly excessive – aggregate sentence not manifestly excessive Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 21A, 193(1), 193C Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), ss 53A, 53(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5(1)(c) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 11C(1), 10(1), 25(2) Firearms Act 1996 (NSW), ss 7(1), 39(1), 62(1), 65(3) Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW), s 7(1) Cases Cited: Aryal v R [2021] NSWCCA 2 BB v R [2021] NSWCCA 283 Benn v R [2023] NSWCCA 24 Chartres-Abbott v R [2021] NSWCCA 239 Davidson v R [2022] NSWCCA 153; 100 MVR 336 Decision Restricted [2019] NSWCCA 102 Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa (2010) 79 NSWLR 1; [2010] NSWCCA 194 He v Sun (2021) 104 NSWLR 518; [2021] NSWCA 95 Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 Huang v R [2019] NSWCCA 144 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297; (2014) 246 A Crim R 528 McLean v R [2020] NSWCCA 344 R v Li [2014] NSWCCA 327 R v Mahmud [2010] NSWCCA 219 Sahyoun v R [2020] NSWCCA 87 Tiew v R [2020] NSWCCA 234 Toole, Kurt v R (2014) 247 A Crim R 272; [2014] NSWCCA 318 TS v R [2022] NSWCCA 222 Vaughan v R [2020] NSWCCA 3 Vigo v R [2009] NSWCCA 98 Weiss v R [2020] NSWCCA 188 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: XY (A Pseudonym) (Applicant) Rex (Crown) Representation: Counsel: Z Khan (Applicant) D Scully (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate