NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Chapman v Nicolosi (No 2) [2023] NSWCATAP 73 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 15 March 2023 Decision date: 14 March 2023 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: I R Coleman SC ADCJ, Principal Member G Curtin SC, Senior Member Decision: 1. An oral hearing of the remaining issues is dispensed with. 2. The proceedings are remitted to a differently constituted Tribunal. 3. The respondent is to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal as agreed or assessed. 4. Execution of that order for costs is stayed pending the determination of the remitted proceedings (and any appeal therefrom if there be one) or further order of the Tribunal. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — particular administrative bodies — NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal – internal appeal – remittal of proceedings to Tribunal – remittal to the Tribunal as originally constituted or to a differently constituted Tribunal - considerations Legislation Cited: Nil Cases Cited: Allen v TriCare (Hastings) Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 25 BCS v NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal [2015] NSWSC 126 Comcare v Broadhurst [2011] FCAFC 39 Chapman v Nicolosi [2023] NSWCATAP 44 Glen Cameron Nominees Pty Ltd v Transport Workers' Union of Australia (No 2) [2017] FCA 1515 Macquarie International Health Clinic Pty Ltd v Sydney South West Area Health Service [2010] NSWCA 348 Northern NSW FM Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal & Anor (1990) 26 FCR 39; [1990] FCAFC 642 Pavlovic v Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 31 Seltsam Pty Limited v Ghaleb [2005] NSWCA 208 Thompson v Chapman [2016] NSWCATAP 6 Walker Corporation Pty Ltd v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority [2009] NSWCA 178 Yong v Antworks Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAP 14 Texts Cited: M Batskos, Natural Justice and the Constitution of Tribunal Membership (1998) 16 AIAL Forum 22 Recent Cases (1994) 68) ALJ Category: Consequential orders Parties: Nigel Christopher Chapman (Appellant) Gail Joy Nicolosi (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Carolan (Appellant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate