NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: HS v R [2023] NSWCCA 54 Hearing dates: 1 March 2023 Date of orders: 22 March 2023 Decision date: 22 March 2023 Before: Beech-Jones CJ at CL at [1] Davies at [5] McNaughton J at [43] Decision: 1. Grant leave to appeal. 2. Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeals – against conviction – two counts of indecent assault of child under 16 years – one count of commit act of indecency towards child under 16 years – one count of attempted sexual intercourse with child under 10 years – applicant acquitted on last two counts but convicted on first two counts – whether inconsistent verdicts – where evidence on all counts not based solely on account of victim – where other evidence on last two counts may have raised a doubt in the jury's mind – where tendency evidence admitted in relation to first two counts – verdicts not inconsistent Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 61M, 61N, 66B Cases Cited: MacKenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348; [1996] HCA 35 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606; [2002] HCA 53 R v Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82; [2001] NSWCCA 290 Pell v The Queen (2020) 268 CLR 123; [2020] HCA 12 TK v R (2009) 74 NSWLR 299; [2009] NSWCCA 151 Walker v R [2019] NSWCCA 4 Texts Cited: Nil Category: Principal judgment Parties: HS (Applicant) The King (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Segal (Applicant) M Millward (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate