NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Rumsby [2023] NSWSC 229 Hearing dates: 30 and 31 January 2023 1, 2 and 3 February 2023 Date of orders: 16 March 2023 Decision date: 16 March 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: R A Hulme AJ Decision: Evidence of the admissions admissible. Catchwords: EVIDENCE – pretrial ruling – two counts alleging attempted choking to commit sexual assault and murder – admissions made to an undercover police officer during covert "scenario investigation" – unsuccessful attempt to distinguish this operation from others by reference to features such as tempting accused to be a reward seeker and requiring admissions to be made to "both or none" – objections under Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) on bases of admissions made as result of oppressive conduct (s 84), unreliability (s 85), unfairness (s 90) and improperly obtained (s 138) – evidence held admissible Legislation Cited: Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), ss 15A, 15E Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 578A Evidence Act 1900 (NSW), ss 84, 85, 90, 136, 138, 189 Cases Cited: Deacon v The Queen (2019) [2019] NTCCA21; 282 A Crim R 303; Director of Public Prosecutions v Ghiller [2003] VSC 350; (2003) 151 A Crim R 148 Em v The Queen (2007) 232 CLR 67; [2007] HCA 46 Habib v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (2010) 76 NSWLR 299; [2010] NSWCA 34 In the Matter of an Application by the Chief Commissioner of Police (Vic) [2005] HCA 18; (2005) 79 ALJR 881 Lauchlan v The State of Western Australia [2008] WASCA 227 R v Cowan; Ex parte Attorney General; [2015] QCA 87; [2016] 1 Qd R 433 R v Esposito (1998) 45 NSWLR 442 R v Jelicic [2016] SASC 57 R v Kilincer (No 2) [2021] NSWSC 829 R v Simmons; R v Moore (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 143; (2015) 249 A Crim R 82 R v Fesus (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1467 R v Swaffield (1998) 192 CLR 159; [1998] HCA 1 R v Tarantino (No 6) [2019] NSWSC 1174 R v Weaven (Ruling No 1) [2011] VSC 442 Smith v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 650; [2001] HCA 50 Standage v State of Tasmania [2017] TASCCA 23 Tofilau v The Queen (2007) 231 CLR 396; [2007] HCA 39 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Rex (Crown) Craig Henry Rumsby (Accused) Representation: Counsel: L Carr SC (Crown) N Broadbent with Z Alderton (Accused)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate