NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Van Gorp v Davy [2023] NSWCA 43 Hearing dates: 13 March 2023 Date of orders: 13 March 2023 Decision date: 13 March 2023 Before: Leeming JA at [1] and [19] Kirk JA at [2] Decision: Summons seeking leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. Catchwords: APPEAL — Leave to appeal — Abuse of process — appeal to the High Court dismissed — Fresh proceedings involving the same parties, the same issues on essentially the same grounds — Circumvent proper appellate processes — Unjustifiably oppressive to the respondents — Brings the administration of justice into disrepute — No issue of principle or question of general public importance — Leave should be dismissed with costs EQUITY — General principles and maxims — Equity would attend to the real justice of the case — Equity will not intervene on behalf of someone who lacks standing Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Davy v Van Gorp [2022] NSWSC 466 Jenyns v Public Curator (Qld) (1953) 90 CLR 113; [1953] HCA 2 Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd (2015) 256 CLR 507; [2015] HCA 28 UBS AG v Tyne (2018) 265 CLR 77; [2018] HCA 45 Van Gorp v Davy [2021] NSWSC 1509 Van Gorp v Davy [2022] NSWCA 117 Van Gorp v Davy [2022] NSWSC 1167 Van Gorp v Davy [2022] NSWSC 39 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378; [1993] HCA 77 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Sean Cornelius Van Gorp (Applicant) James Ashleigh Davy (First Respondent) Kimberley Ann Evans (Second Respondent) Representation: Advocates:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate