NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Castle Hill Panorama Pty Ltd v The Hills Shire Council [2023] NSWLEC 24 Hearing dates: 22, 23 and 27 February, 2 March 2023 Date of orders: 3 and 17 March 2023 Decision date: 17 March 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Moore J Decision: See orders at [53] and in Annexure A Catchwords: APPEAL ‑ proposed amendment to concept development approval ‑ Council raises jurisdictional and merit issues ‑ Applicant and the Council reach agreement on merit issues ‑ Applicant proposes method to resolve jurisdictional issue ‑ Council accents jurisdictional issue resolved ‑ application to dispense with compliance with maximum building height ‑ consideration of tests set by the cl 4.6 of the Hills Local Environmental Plan 2012 (the LEP) ‑ tests satisfied ‑ dispensation from compliance with maximum building height granted ‑ proposed consent orders ‑ necessary satisfaction on Council's jurisdictional contention found ‑ establishment of satisfaction with cl 4.6 tests ‑ appropriate to give effect to proposed consent orders ‑ orders made modifying concept development approval APPEAL ‑ development application for construction of development to give effect to concept development approval ‑ development application contingent on modification of concept approval ‑ concept approval modified ‑ certificate pursuant to cl 4(17)(5) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 provided ‑ other necessary documents provided ‑ cl 4.6 request granted ‑ cl 9.5(4) matters considered - development consent granted subject to conditions Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 The Hills Local Environmental Plan 2012 Cases Cited: RebelMH Neutral Bay Pty Limited v North Sydney Council [2019] NSWCA 130 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Castle Hill Panorama Pty Ltd (Applicant) The Hills Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Hall SC (Applicant) Mr A Seton, solicitor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate