NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Singh v Carroll & Ors [2023] NSWSC 245 Hearing dates: 26 October 2022 Date of orders: 23 March 2023 Decision date: 23 March 2023 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: McNaughton J Decision: (1) The Statement of Claim so far as it concerns the Property Claims is summarily dismissed pursuant to r 13.4(1)(c) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW). (2) The balance of the Statement of Claim is struck out pursuant to r 14.28 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW). (3) Gurjit Singh is to pay the costs of the Notices of Motion as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: CIVIL – notice of motion to summarily dismiss and/or strike out statement of claim – respondent to motion is an undischarged bankrupt – whether respondent has lack of standing due to bankruptcy – whether causes of action correctly put – property claims summarily dismissed as incompetent and an abuse of process – no reasonable cause of action disclosed for emotional distress claim and misfeasance in public office claim – entire statement of claim summarily dismissed or struck out Legislation Cited: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 5, 58, 116, 126 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 56 Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) s 84 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) rr 12.11, 13.4, 14.28 Cases Cited: Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552; [2000] HCA 41 Agius v New South Wales [2001] NSWCA 371 Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (2006) 226 CLR 256; [2006] HCA 27 Clavel v Savage (No 2) [2014] NSWSC 463 Cox v Journeaux (No 2) (1935) 52 CLR 713; [1935] HCA 48 Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62; [1949] HCA 1 Elali (a bankrupt) v Mahrs [2013] NSWSC 1883 Faulkner v Bluett (1981) 52 FLR 115 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125; [1964] HCA 69 Giller v Procopets (2008) 24 VR 1; [2008] VSCA 236 Habib v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) (2009) 175 FCR 350; [2009] FCA 228 Kostov v Amelie Housing (NCAT Appeal) [2019] NSWSC 16 Massalski v The Owners SP 90255 & Ors. [2023] NSWSC 23 Nyoni v Shire of Kellerberrin (2017) 248 FCR 311; [2017] FCAFC 59 Penthouse Publications Ltd v McWilliam (Court of Appeal (NSW), Priestley and Meagher JJA and Wardell AJA, 15 March 1991, unrep) Samootin v Shea [2010] NSWCA 371 Shaw v State of New South Wales [2012] NSWCA 102 Simmons v New South Wales Trustee and Guardian [2014] NSWCA 405 Singh v Lekhwar [2022] NSWCATAP 158 Thistlethwayte v Gender Estates Pty Ltd (1976) 8 ALR 700 Ugur v Attorney General for New South Wales [2019] NSWCA 86 Watkins v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 2 AC 395; [2006] UKHL 17 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dominique Anne Carroll (First Applicant in First Notice of Motion/First Defendant in Statement of Claim) Daniel Joseph McKinnon (Second Applicant in First Notice of Motion/Second Defendant in Statement of Claim) Complete Legal Pty Ltd (Third Applicant in First Notice of Motion/Third Defendant in Statement of Claim) Suzanne Gainsford-Holland (First Applicant in Second Notice of Motion/Sixth Defendant in Statement of Claim) Gurjit Singh (Respondent to First and Second Notices of Motion/Plaintiff in Statement of Claim) Representation: Counsel: K Boyd (First, Second and Third Applicant in First Notice of Motion) R Lee (First Applicant in Second Notice of Motion) Respondent (Self-Represented)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate