NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: 2 Phillip Rise Pty Ltd v Kempsey Shire Council [2023] NSWLEC 28 Hearing dates: 12 December 2022 Decision date: 22 March 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Moore J Decision: See directions at [73] Catchwords: APPEAL - Appeal against the refusal of application for a construction certificate ‑ Acting Commissioner holds that development consent proposed to found the construction certificate had lapsed ‑ Applicant challenges Acting Commissioner's conclusion as wrong at law ‑ Acting Commissioner concluded that contamination testing did not satisfy a condition of the development consent because the testing had not been carried out by the then owner of the site for the purposes of satisfying the development consent - carrying out contamination testing in satisfaction of the condition of the development consent relied upon by the Applicant as demonstrating the development consent had not lapsed ‑ condition required that contamination testing be undertaken ‑ purpose for which the relevant contamination testing was carried out ‑ carrying out of contamination testing which complied with the terms of the development consent condition as a matter of fact, in its scope sufficient to satisfy the condition no matter by whom and why that testing was carried out - appeal upheld ‑ directions given to permit construction certificate to be uploaded to the Planning Portal and the making of orders to finalise the proceedings COSTS ‑ costs in s 56A appeals follow the event - Respondent ordered to pay the Applicant's costs of the appeal Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 99 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 56A Cases Cited: 2 Phillip Rise Pty Ltd v Kempsey Shire Council [2022] NSWLEC 1107 Hunter Development Brokerage Pty Ltd v Cessnock City Council; Tovedale Pty Ltd v Shoalhaven City Council (2005) 63 NSWLR 124; [2005] NSWCA 169 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Taylor v The Owners of Strata Plan 11564 and Others (2014) 253 CLR 531; [2014] HCA 9 Category: Principal judgment Parties: 2 Phillip Rise Pty Ltd (Applicant) Kempsey Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr R Lancaster SC (Applicant) Mr M Seymour, barrister (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate