NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lismore City Council v Ross [2023] NSWLEC 29 Hearing dates: 14 March 2023 Date of orders: 15 March 2023 Decision date: 14 March 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Moore J Decision: See orders in Annexure A Catchwords: CIVIL ENFORCEMENT ‑ swimming pool fence significantly non‑compliant with the requirements of Swimming Pools Act 1992 and its regulations - property significantly neglected ‑ pool fence not childproof ‑ risk to public safety ‑ in 2021, Council orders rectification of defective swimming pool safety fence ‑ property owners failed to comply ‑ in 2022, Council commences civil enforcement action ‑ failure to rectify fencing in response to the commencement of civil enforcement action ‑ Council seeks orders for compliance ‑ Council also seeks substituted performance order to permit filling in of swimming pool if fencing not rectified by owners ‑ no appearance by owners at any interlocutory hearing ‑ substituted service orders made ‑ no appearance by owners at final hearing ‑ inspection of property on day of final hearing ‑ photographs taken and tendered ‑ oral evidence by telephone from inspecting officer ‑ photographs disclose unsafe nature of fencing ‑ photographs show property unkempt and vegetation which would permit climbing and access to pool area even if compliant fencing installed ‑ appropriate to order owners to install compliant fencing and remove vegetation within nominated time period ‑ appropriate to make substituted performance order to permit filling in of pool if continuing non‑compliance ‑ orders made COSTS ‑ costs conventionally follow the event ‑ no reason to depart from conventional position ‑ owners ordered to pay Council's costs of the proceedings Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act of 2005, s 98(1) Dividing Fences Act 1991 Swimming Pools Act 1992, s 23 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Lismore City Council (Applicant) Ronald John Ross (First Respondent) Margaret Joy Ross (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr Michael Young, solicitor (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate