NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Catlin v Draper [2023] NSWCA 49 Hearing dates: 1 March 2023 Decision date: 24 March 2023 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Mitchelmore JA at [2]; Adamson JA at [3] Decision: (1) Grant leave to appeal. (2) Dismiss the appeal. (3) Unless an application is made in writing for a different order within 14 days, order the appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Catchwords: APPEAL — negligence — whether reasons sufficient — nature of breach found — contested factual findings of primary judge — assessment of witnesses' evidence — nature of review on appeal TORTS — alleged incongruity between criminal act of respondent and imposition of duty of care on appellant — defence of illegality under the common law and s 54 of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) — whether appellant acting in self-defence — application of ss 52 and 53 of Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) TORTS — consideration of "agony of the moment" defence — where onus lies — evidentiary onus TORTS — contributory negligence — whether sufficient reasons given for discount of 25% when appellant sought 80-90% Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5D, 5R, 5S, 52, 53, 54 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), s 138 Road Transport (Driver Licensing) Regulation 2017 (NSW), regs 38, 119 Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 75A Cases Cited: Abdallah v Newton (1998) 28 MVR 364 Bevan v Coolahan (2019) 101 NSWLR 86; [2019] NSWCA 217 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280; [1993] FCA 456 Cusack v Stayt [2000] NSWCA 244 Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499; [1936] HCA 40 Housing Commission of New South Wales v Tatmar Pastoral Co Pty Ltd [1983] 3 NSWLR 378 Lee v Lee (2019) 266 CLR 129; [2019] HCA 28 Leishman v Thomas; Hobbs (Third-Party) (1957) 75 WN (NSW) 173 Miller v Miller (2011) 242 CLR 446; [2011] HCA 9 New South Wales Land and Housing Corporation v Orr (2019) 100 NSWLR 578; [2019] NSWCA 231 Onassis v Vergottis [1968] 2 Lloyd's Rep 403 Pettitt v Dunkley (1971) 1 NSWLR 376 Small v K & R Fabrications (W'gong) Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 70 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in Liq) [1999] HCA 3; (1999) 73 ALJR 306 Strbak v Newton [1989] NSWCA 202 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Brooke Amanda Catlin (Appellant) Taylor Maree Draper (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Deakin KC / B Kelleher SC (Appellant) L King SC / P O'Rourke (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate