NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: ASSK Investments Pty Ltd v Tyrrell [2023] NSWSC 271 Hearing dates: 17 March 2023 Date of orders: 17 March 2023 Decision date: 17 March 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity - Applications List Before: Henry J Decision: See [39] Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — leave to discontinue — costs — default provision for costs in r 42.19 UCPR — where defendant acted reasonably in his responses to plaintiff's pre-litigation inquiries — where reasonableness of commencement of proceedings challenged by defendant — where defendant acted reasonably by consenting to disclosure motion Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Bitannia Pty Ltd v Parkline Constructions Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 32 Galea v Camilleri [2019] NSWSC 167 Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36 Ibrahim v PERI Australia Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 328 Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; [1990] HCA 59 Nichols v NFS Agribusiness Pty Ltd (2018) 97 NSWLR 681; [2018] NSWCA 84 Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; [1997] HCA 6 Walton v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2020] NSWCA 191 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: ASSK Investments Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Paul Tyrrell (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Mahendra (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate