NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Russell and Dunphy v Dunphy [2023] NSWSC 282 Hearing dates: 21 March 2023 Date of orders: 28 March 2023 Decision date: 28 March 2023 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Hammerschlag CJ in Eq Decision: The Summons is dismissed. See [69]-[70] Catchwords: CONTRACTS – LOAN – DECEASED ESTATE – where a deceased person is alleged to have lent monies to an adult child – requirements to establish the existence of a contract for loan – existence of loan not established Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Cases Cited: Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd [1970] AC 567 Boss Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Rohrig (NSW) Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 374 Coshott v Sakic (1998) 44 NSWLR 667 Empirnall Holdings Pty Limited v Machon Paull Partners Pty Ltd (1988) 14 NSWLR 523 Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc (2002) 209 CLR 95; [2002] HCA 8 Fischer v Nemeske Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCA 6 Hampton Court Ltd v Crookes (1957) 97 CLR 367; [1957] HCA 28 Heydon v Perpetual Executors Trustees & Agency Co (WA) Ltd (1930) 45 CLR 111; [1930] HCA 26 Joaquin v Hall [1976] VR 788 JP Morgan Australia Ltd v Consolidated Minerals Ltd [2010] NSWSC 100 Ogilvie v Adams [1981] VR 1041 Young v Queensland Trustees Limited (1956) 99 CLR 560; [1956] HCA 51 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michelle Catherine Russell (First Plaintiff) Brent Patrick Dunphy (Second Plaintiff) Adam Brian Dunphy (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: A Hourigan (Plaintiffs) A Spencer (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate