NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Health Care Complaints Commission v Litchfield (No 3) (Costs) [2023] NSWCATOD 44 Hearing dates: On the papers after 3 March 2023 Date of orders: 04 April 2023 Decision date: 04 April 2023 Jurisdiction: Occupational Division Before: Coleman SC ADCJ, Principal Member Decision: (1) The Respondent pay the Applicant's costs of and incidental to the proceedings as agreed or assessed on a party and party basis. Catchwords: COSTS – party/party – general rule that costs follow the event – application of the rule and discretion – where Stage 1 and Stage 2 hearings combined – whether applicant successful on overall basis – whether proportional costs order should be made in favour of applicant Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 4(1)(b) Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW), ss 3B, 165, 165B, Sch 5D cll 1(2), 13 Cases Cited: Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Rawson Homes Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 334 Avopiling Pty Ltd v Bosevski [2018] NSWCA 146 BHP Billiton Iron Ore Pty Ltd v National Competition Council (No 2) [2007] FCA 557 Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 304 Commonwealth of Australia v Gretton [2008] NSWCA 117 Firebird Global Master Fund II Ltd v Republic of Nauru (No2) [2015] HCA 53; (2015) 327 ALR 192 Health Care Complaints Commission v Litchfield [2022] NSWCATOD 97 Health Care Complaints Commission v Philipiah [2013] NSWCA 342 Oikos Constructions Pty Ltd (t/as Lars Fischer Construction) v Ostin & Anor (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 98 Oshlack v Richmond City Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Patrech v Psychology Board of Australia (No 2) [2023] NSWCATOD 9 Qasim v Health Care Complaints Commission [2015] NSWCA 282 Sabah Yazgi v Permanent Custodians Ltd (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 306 Waterman v Gerling Australia Insurance Company Pty Ltd (No 2) (Costs) [2005] NSWSC 1111 Category: Costs Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Applicant) Bruce Desmond Litchfield (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: P Lowson (Applicant) P Aitken (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate