NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Murray v R [2023] NSWCCA 79 Hearing dates: 1 February 2023 Decision date: 12 April 2023 Before: Rothman J at [1] Wilson J at [4] Yehia J at [126] Decision: 1. Extend the time to file the application for leave to appeal as necessary; 2. Grant leave to appeal; and 3. Dismiss the appeal. Catchwords: CRIME – appeal against conviction – aggravated sexual assault – whether the verdict of the jury is unreasonable or unsupported by the evidence – lack of opportunity – whether the jurors were alive to the inconsistencies, discrepancies and other inadequacies in the evidence – complainant's evidence not implausible or incredible – jury entitled to prefer evidence of the complainant – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Cases Cited: AJ v R [2022] NSWCCA 136 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Jamie Murray (Applicant) Rex (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: A Evers (Applicant) A Bonner (Respondent)
Solicitors: Legal Aid NSW (Applicant) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2018/149713 Publication restriction: Statutory non-publication order protecting the identity of complainant. Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 14 December 2020 Before: Blackmore SC DCJ File Number(s): 2018/149713
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate