NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: TNAU Finery Pty Ltd v SuperBurrito Pty Ltd; SuperBurrito Pty Ltd v TNAU Finery Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] NSWCATAP 101 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 06 April 2023 Decision date: 06 April 2023 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: A Suthers, Principal Member D Robertson, Senior Member Decision: (1) A hearing in respect of costs is dispensed with. (2) TNAU Finery Pty Ltd is to pay 20% of the costs of SuperBurrito Pty Ltd in the appeals, on the ordinary basis. Catchwords: APPEAL – costs – both parties having success on appeal – one party succeeding on a ground not raised at first instance LEASES AND TENANCIES — Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW) — Retail and Other Commercial Leases (COVID-19) Regulation 2020 — Landlord entered into possession on ground of unpaid rent — Whether tenant "impacted tenant" for purposes of Regulation Whether tenant had qualified for the jobkeeper scheme established by the Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Rules 2020 (Cth) Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules 2014 (NSW) Cases Cited: Allen v TriCare (Hastings) Ltd [2017] NSWCATAP 25 Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v. Liddiard (No. 2) [2005] NSWCA 296 Carlson v ARA Engine Reconditioning Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] NSWCATAP 39 Firebird Global Master Fund 11 Ltd v Republic of Nauru (No 2) (2015) 327 ALR 192; [2015] HCA 53 Moseley v AB (No 2) [2017] NSWSC 1812 Nassif v Fahd [2007] NSWCA 308 Oshlack v Richmond River Council 193 CLR 72; [1998] HCA 11 Siminton v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (2006) 152 FCR 129; [2006] FCAFC 118 Solomon v Miller (1865) 2 WW & A'B(Eq) 135 Sydney City Council v Geftlick (No 2) [2006] NSWCA 374 Texts Cited: Nil Cited Category: Costs Parties: TNAU Finery Pty Ltd (Appellant in 2022/00068195, Respondent in 2022/00069427) SuperBurrito Pty Ltd (First Respondent in 2022/00068195, Appellant in 2022/00069427) Zong Yuan Qin (Second Respondent in 2022/00068195) Representation: Counsel: D Smallbone (TNAU Finery Pty Ltd) W Chan with W Flick (SuperBurrito Pty Ltd and Zong Yuan Qin)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate